Skip to content

Investigation continues into toxic vapour cloud incident in Sudbury

Sudbury deputy fire chief clarifies incident was the result of a chemical reaction that produced a cloud of red fuming nitric acid, not an explosion
110124_lg_sudbury_workplace_explosion-photo1
The Ontario Ministry of Labour has confirmed it is involved in the investigation of a nitric acid vapour cloud on the morning of Thursday, Jan. 11, 2024, at an industrial plant on Maley Drive in Sudbury.

Greater Sudbury Fire Services has wrapped up its on-scene investigation into a chemical reaction that produced a toxic vapour cloud and forced the evacuation of an industrial plant in Sudbury on Jan. 11.

Although the Ontario Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development told Sudbury.com the incident was identified as an “explosion”, Sudbury Deputy Fire Chief Jesse Oshell clarified later it was, in fact, a chemical reaction that caused a vapour cloud.

The incident occurred Thursday, shortly after 9 a.m. at the Quatro Industries Ltd. plant at 2555 Maley Dr.  

Oshell said the chemical substance was a form of highly concentrated nitric acid called red fuming nitric acid.

Fire, paramedics and police all responded to the incident. Oshell said Greater Sudbury Fire Services hazardous materials team responded as well. When hazardous materials team arrived, Oshell said Quatro employees had already appeared to have handled the situation.

"The company and its workers had moved the product outdoors prior to our arrival. Our hazardous materials team assessed the situation and scene, they ensured it was a safe scene so that the product wasn't going anywhere; that it couldn't be accessed; that it was not further reacting," said Oshell.

He said the next step was to neutralize and contain the substance.

He added that he wanted to emphasize there was no explosion, but a chemical reaction that produced a vapour cloud of red fuming nitric acid. Oshell said some employees were checked out to ensure they were not ill or injured by the vapour.

"So we did have individuals assessed by paramedics on scene, those who may have been working with or around the product at the time or any individual that stated they may have inhaled part of the product. But Paramedic Services triaged and assessed those individuals on site, and no one was transported to hospital," said Oshell.

Oshell said the substance was identified as No. 2032 in the Transport Canada Emergency Response Guide (ERG) which lists the product as Nitric Acid, red fuming.  The product is listed under the emergency response Guide-157 which states nitric acid is toxic and/or corrosive, is non-combustible and water-sensitive.

For potential hazards, the ERG book said the substance may cause injury or burns to the skin or eyes. It can react with water or moist air to release toxic gasses. Reaction with water could generate heat and create additional fumes. The response guide also warned that fumes could accumulate in confined spaces and that enclosed areas should be ventilated.

Len Gillis is a reporter at Sudbury.com.


What's next?


If you would like to apply to become a Verified reader Verified Commenter, please fill out this form.


Discussion


Len Gillis

About the Author: Len Gillis

Graduating from the Journalism program at Canadore College in the 1970s, Gillis has spent most of his career reporting on news events across Northern Ontario with several radio, television and newspaper companies. He also spent time as a hardrock miner.
Read more