Weather

News And Views

Classifieds

Announcements

Entertainment

More Local

Shop Local

Search The Web

Google Search

Local News

Council begins budget discussions

Monday, March 18, 2013   by: Darren Taylor

City Council and staff began discussing 2013 budget deliberations at a special meeting held Monday at the Civic Centre.

City of Sault Ste. Marie Chief Administrative Officer Joe Fratesi told Council no final decision on the proposed budget would be made at Monday’s meeting, but invited Council members to bring forward any concerns.

The proposed budget prepared by the City includes a 3.56 percent property tax increase on the average home valued at $146,000.

Documentation released Friday shows the proposed 2013 budget comes in at over $99.6 million, a $4.2 million (or 4.42 percent) increase over the 2012 budget.

Included in the budget is $2,090,000 in contingency provision, partly for contract negotiations for unionized City workers.  Sault firefighters and EMS workers contracts expire in January and March 2014, respectively.

A City surplus of $1,000,000 is also included in the budget.

Facing the City is a $203,000 reduction in Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF) money, a $374,000 decrease in Ontario Lottery payment in lieu of taxes, and a $150,000 reduction in gaming and casino revenue.

City staff has indicated changes in OMPF funding, in particular, will pose challenges for the City beginning in 2014.

The DSSAB (District of Sault Ste. Marie Social Services Administration Board) annual levy is yet to come in.

In addition, the final surplus audit from 2012 is yet to be finalized.

The target date to conclude 2013 budget deliberations is April 8, immediately following Council’s regular meeting on that day.

There are two “what if” scenarios which may see the proposed property tax hike of 3.56 percent be whittled down to 3.02 percent, or as low as 2.48 percent.

Ward Two Councillor Susan Myers asked if there were any areas in City expenses that could be made if Council, as expected, objects to the proposed 3.56 percent property tax hike.

To that, Fratesi responded alterations could be made to a number of areas, including police and fire services, and winter maintenance by Public Works and Transportation.

However, Fratesi continued, everything within the budget is “near and dear to someone’s heart” and that any cuts or alterations in the way money is spent would not be easy.

Councillors also expressed concern over lost tax revenue from businesses that have closed up shop, such as St. Mary's Paper and Transcom.

Ward Two Councillor Terry Sheehan said it is vital the Sault’s Economic Development Corporation (EDC) continues to step forward and be a job incubator for the community to broaden its tax base.

$11,623,000 in roadwork is slated for 2013, including Queen Street East Phase II (from Simpson Street to Pine Street), Kohler Street from Queen Street to Wellington Street, Great Northern Road from Second Line to Third Line, as well as other road resurfacing projects.

Pricey high priority expenditure requests from various City departments include a one-time cost of $410,000 for the purchase of a new, forty foot, heavy duty low floor bus for City Transit, to replace an existing bus which is now 23 years old.

There is also a need to purchase one Para bus to replace the current, 13-year-old Para bus.  The estimated cost of that request is $75,000.

Supplementary budget requests from outside agencies include a $35,000 request from the Canadian Bushplane Heritage Centre and $15,000 from the St. Mary’s River Marine Heritage Centre (the Norgoma).

Data shows the City’s long-term debt was down to $14.6 million as of December 31, 2012, down from $16.7 million in 2011.

$4.3 million of that long-term debt is for spending on the West End Community Centre (WECC). 

The City's credit rating was upgraded to A plus in 2012.

Ward Six City Councillor Frank Manzo, never one to support City budgets, said there were simply not enough taxpayers in Sault Ste. Marie to support the proposed budget.

“There’s too much in the budget for taxpayers to absorb,” Manzo said, adding that facilities such as baseball parks should be paid for by groups that use them, not taxpayers at large.

 

Comments
9
Please sign in to post a response
Note: Comments that appear on the site are not the opinion of SooToday.com. Keep discussions civil and on topic. Refrain from obscenity and don't post anything that your grandmother would be ashamed to read. Those who do not abide by these guidelines will have their membership revoked without notice. If you see an abusive post, please click the link beside the post to report it.
Justin_time 3/18/2013 11:02:22 PM Report

I always want to believe Sootoday is unbiased and not in the city's back pocket...but when I see all the responses deleted when some comments are close to the truth makes me wonder.

Some comments get out of hand, some are near truth of what is going on and it's all about freedom of speech....yet this site deletes at will.....

we always wonder sootoday!
Justin_time 3/18/2013 11:17:11 PM Report

Why are we getting an increase at all?

This City has received an enormous increase in property values from MPAC's recent assessment. This includes residential, commercial, institutional and industrial properties. Not only has all these soared through the roof based on so called market trend but the City has also received over 20 million in extra new business from work done in 2012 in addition to the value increases.

What does this mean? Well with a budget that has been nominally the same over the last 5-10 years, give or take a few million, and all these new values....our mil rate should be taking a steep dive.

I am a home owner too. I realize values go up with good trends. I also expect values should drop the same amount with poor trends. This never happens. But what happens with those high values when the City gets them in a good year? They seem to be manipulated and still show us we must have an increase in mil rate. Why????

If you don't know what the City does, it divides the property values into the current budget to get our current mil rate for 2013. Well with millions and millions of new values going into a basically same budget from last year, including the pay increases for our City Mafia Club, we should see the mil rate decrease and decrease sharply.

All of us, residents of Sault Ste Marie, should email or call your councilor and ask them why our mil rate is not going down. Sure the budget should increase, sure we should see new services, sure we have to plan for future growth and infrastructure...but somehow the numbers just don't add up.

SPEAK UP!!!!!!!
QUESTION WHY!!!!!!
BE LOUD AND BE HEARD!!!!!

Norm 3/19/2013 1:54:18 AM Report

Helwig ran a better site, I think. Sponsers should be concerned if the site begins to lose users.
HONEST1 3/19/2013 7:08:58 AM Report

Justin-time you are so correct. Great post. Also want add that city officials forget that most private sector jobs do not give annual pay increases so any property tax hike would really take away from the average workers bottom line. Then factor in higher PUC, insuracne, food and gas prices. Not much left of that persons paycheck!! We all have to stick together and protest any tax increase. Enough already. Remember trim from the top. Figure it out city hall scammers!!!!!
KMF61MCF 3/19/2013 11:01:59 AM Report

Maybe its time for an "OUTSIDE AUDITOR" to come in and look at the book??
guestwho 3/19/2013 11:12:39 AM Report

I thinks it time for an IDLE NO MORE parade.
ryeandcoke 3/19/2013 1:39:23 PM Report

Something needs to be done before this happens. Their is no reason for an increase in our taxes.
FunMan 3/19/2013 5:33:38 PM Report

They said last night at the budget that management gets the average salary increase of the unions. While this is correct, I noticed that they didn't mention that management had their benefits extended last summer until age 75 from age 65. It must be nice you retire at age say 60 and have your benefits paid by us taxpayers until age 75. The Unions don't have this!!!!
It makes you wonder who is up for retirement soon!!!!
Firefly7 3/19/2013 8:55:13 PM Report

Council should definitely look at taking a cut in pay -a certain alderman doesn't even return residents calls anymore - what are they getting paid for? - cut from the top as the other posters mentioned. We can't afford this anymore.
Comments
9
Please sign in to post a response
Note: Comments that appear on the site are not the opinion of SooToday.com. Keep discussions civil and on topic. Refrain from obscenity and don't post anything that your grandmother would be ashamed to read. Those who do not abide by these guidelines will have their membership revoked without notice. If you see an abusive post, please click the link beside the post to report it.
Handiman ClemDavid Orazietti MPP
Sault BluesChristie's RV
Advertising | Membership | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | About SooToday.com | Contact Us | Feedback

Copyright ©2013 SooToday.com - All rights reserved