Current Conditions
-1.3 C
Mostly Cloudy
Today's Forecast
-2 C
Mainly cloudy
Sponsored by Highland Ford

News And Views




Shop Local

More Local

Search The Web

Google Search

Local News

Less study, more action on harbour: KPMG tells City

Tuesday, February 05, 2013   by: Darren Taylor

Sault Ste. Marie “must stop studying and start implementing” plans for an improved regional harbour, Sudbury-based KPMG consultant Oscar Poloni told City Council Monday.

Poloni made the pitch for Council to approve next steps in moving the massive concept forward, joined by Transportation/Infrastructure Committee (TIC) Chair Don Mitchell.
Poloni pointed out the need for a new harbour (to be located near Essar Steel Algoma (shown) and split in two parts, one for the steelmaker and the second for other stakeholders such as Tenaris Algoma Tubes), the cost of its’ construction (approximately $120 million, in government and private sector funding), as well as what the economic price would be if the project does not go ahead.
The City itself has identified development of a new harbour facility as Sault Ste. Marie’s greatest infrastructure need, and Council approved taking those “next steps.”
Among them are discussions with Essar Steel Algoma, which has already expressed its’ support for the harbour concept, discussions with all other potential harbour users, consultations with First Nations, and highlighting the need for a harbour in applying for government funding.
The report from KPMG states current shipping facilities are in poor operating condition and in a state of disrepair.
It highlights the need for the harbour to help companies, especially Essar and Tenaris, to considerably ramp up their production in the future when the current steelmaking slump turns around, and ship out their goods. New businesses, such as aggregate, slag and salt transport businesses, would also benefit.
Poloni told Council that, along with private sector funding for the $120 million project, there are government funding envelopes available, such as the federal government’s Building Canada Fund and provincial funding through the Northern Ontario Growth Plan.
The report states the harbour would create or retain 600 jobs.
“This is the economic rationale,” Poloni told Council, pointing out the $121 million expenditure would soon pay for itself in increased production and jobs.
He emphasized that without the harbour, firms such as Essar and Tenaris would be left behind in their quest to increase production, and the community would suffer a loss of jobs.
When questioned by Ward One Councillor Paul Christian if low water levels are a concern, Poloni agreed that “water depths have been an issue,” but said that only adds to the urgency of beginning the project.
“If you do dredging now, you’ll be farther ahead,” Poloni said.
Mitchell told the media after gaining Council’s approval to proceed with the project’s next phase “the price we’re going to pay (if the harbour is not built) is loss of jobs.”
“If we cannot expand the dock, then people at Tenaris and other companies are going to be displaced, and if they’re displaced that means no growth from their standpoint. It says very clearly in the report that Tenaris is looking for a 25 to 30 percent increase, or even more, for their operation. We have to understand that in this region we go up and down according to the steel industry, or in the case of Tenaris the oil industry, but if we’re not ready for the upside when it comes, we won’t have the capacity to do it.”
Mitchell said “Essar is on side, we now have to design that port and decide what Essar needs out of this.”
Mitchell added “environmentally, some things have already been done in the area, I think we can proceed. The biggest thing is to now sit down and get the model that has to be designed to operate the public port along with the Essar port.”
As for the whopping $120 million cost, Mitchell said “over the next two to five years, we’re going to spread it out for the government. We’ll say to the government, to Essar and everyone else ‘guess what guys, we’re talking $20 million a year, not $120 million at one time. It’s the spreading out that makes it an easier pill to swallow.”
Mitchell said the estimate of 600 jobs created or retained is “low to medium,” adding there could be a great deal more employment created through the harbour.
“We do know if we don’t do it, we could lose 300 to 500 jobs.”
An enthusiastic Mitchell told reporters he is confident Sault MP Bryan Hayes will successfully spearhead the attempt to win federal funding for the harbour, adding Industry Minister Tony Clement has “spoken openly” about the harbour being a worthy project.
“I feel optimistic. I hope within two years we’re ready to start…hopefully we’ll be shovel ready within two years,” Mitchell said.


Note: Comments that appear on the site are not the opinion of If you see an abusive post, please click the link beside the post to report it.
OMGWTF 2/5/2013 8:47:57 AM Report

I hope the City isn't pitching in any money for this venture
Sam C 2/5/2013 8:55:32 AM Report

Why wouldn't the City pitch in money... it will benefit the City. This project is long overdue -- I recall it was brought up in the 70s -- and the sooner we get started the sooner we'll benefit from it.
James O'Brien 2/5/2013 9:36:30 AM Report

You don't get something for nothing. Investing for the future is worthwhile, particularly if a number of stakeholders are involved.
Saultbie22 2/5/2013 9:53:07 AM Report

This is great for the Sault. We definitely need it!
bignickel 2/5/2013 11:31:29 AM Report

120 Million for an infrastructure project that will create 600 jobs and will benefit the SOO into the foreseeable future.
What a bargain.
Stevie-E 2/5/2013 11:36:37 AM Report


$120 million is not much nowadays. It will be spread out to many local businesses...and suppliers...and restaurants...and bars...and hotels, etc. etc.

Infrastructure investment is expensive to you and I, but that is small compared to what other municipalities spend. It's time to invest up north!

Sarcasm is toxic, especially when you have not made a point. So, if you really have issues, go to someone who cares what you have to say.
Stevie-E 2/5/2013 11:37:42 AM Report


If you were serious...I apologize.
Ricatoni 2/5/2013 3:01:33 PM Report

This harper conservative goverment spent over one hundred million dollars on a summit..yea over one hundred million,to dine and entertain politicians from around the world, 50 million of which went into the finance ministers riding of the Muskokas ..$150,000,000 to these guys is chump change........and just when would this big project get started?? after the newly announced (two years ago) 50 million dollar border crossing LMAO!!!!!!!! ..Brian Hayes has not done one thing for this community since winning the vote and I dont expect anything to change any time soon.....
But KPMG seems to no everything about nothing for a percentage or a fee.......
Note: Comments that appear on the site are not the opinion of If you see an abusive post, please click the link beside the post to report it.
Advertising | Membership | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | About | Contact Us | Feedback

Copyright ©2014 - All rights reserved