Elliot Lake mall collapse victims launch class action suit
Friday, July 06, 2012 by: SooToday.com Staff
A class action law suit has been filed on behalf of the victims of the tragic Algo Centre Mall roof collapse on June 23 that claimed the lives of Doloris Perizzolo and Lucie Aylwin.
More than 20 additional people sustained non-life threatening injuries when a portion of the mall's roof top parking lot fell through the structure.
Sources indicate the suit targets mall owners, the City of Elliot Lake and the Government of Ontario.
Ontario Provincial Police launched a criminal investigation into the incident earlier this week.
Note: Comments that appear on the site are not the opinion of SooToday.com. Keep discussions civil and on topic. Refrain from obscenity and don't post anything that your grandmother would be ashamed to read. Those who do not abide by these guidelines will have their membership revoked without notice. If you see an abusive post, please click the link beside the post to report it.
vmac 7/6/2012 4:58:33 PM ReportSomebodies rear end is gonna be puckering up on the stand
experimentmwlookingform 7/6/2012 11:26:25 PM Reportno doubt....not just puckering up but for once the governments gonna have to pay out for their faults instead of taking from those with way less than them. it's their ignorance that caused this to begin with. i lived there 8 years ago and that mall was falling apart back then....like WOW that's all i can say.
clane 7/7/2012 8:59:54 AM Reportinteresting, wonder why the City of Elliot Lake was not named as well. After all would they not be the first level of Gov. responsible for building safety etc.
Also, supposedly the building recently had an inspection by an engineering firm and they found nothing wrong. Why are they not named?
clane 7/7/2012 9:00:41 AM Reportnevermind, miss read part of the article the city was named..
chichismom 7/7/2012 12:27:58 PM Reportyes, i do believe the inspection agency should be named. This suit seems to be too fast to base on actual facts though. Don't get me wrong, it should be filed! But getting a few more answers first might have made for more directed arguements, and maybe the inspection company being held liable also.
angie_pie99 7/8/2012 1:12:44 AM ReportTHEY WONT NAME NO ONE THEY ALL TOGETHER IN THIS AND TRYING TO HIDE EVERYTHING
Note: Comments that appear on the site are not the opinion of SooToday.com. Keep discussions civil and on topic. Refrain from obscenity and don't post anything that your grandmother would be ashamed to read. Those who do not abide by these guidelines will have their membership revoked without notice. If you see an abusive post, please click the link beside the post to report it.
