Current Conditions
2.6 C
Mostly Cloudy
Today's Forecast
5 C
Chance of showers
Sponsored by Highland Ford

News And Views




Shop Local

More Local

Search The Web

Google Search


Time article tells readers: “Don’t feel guilty about eating animals.”

Friday, May 16, 2014   by: Greener Ideal

 By Chrissy Spallone

An article by Jeffrey Kluger published in Time last Tuesday caught my eye with the provocative headline, “Don’t Feel Guilty About Eating Animals.” As an intellectually honest person, I’m always interested to read a compelling opposing view, but unfortunately this one was pretty weak and made its point mostly with circular logic. What a disappointment.

It’s not that there aren’t some legitimate arguments for eating animal products. I have to admit, there are. The threat of overpopulation is one of them, and “invasivores” use this argument to justify eating only invasive species of animals that threaten the natural balance in an ecosystem. In The Omnivore’s Dilemma, author Michael Pollan points out that humans give livestock food and shelter, without which they couldn’t survive, and in exchange it’s fair to take their eggs, dairy products, and even their lives. I’m not condoning any of the above, but they’re examples of arguments that have made me think and wonder if things would go out of whack for the human race if animal populations were left unchecked.

The Kluger article starts out with some cliche arguments that every vegetarian is sick to death of hearing. First is the old chestnut, “If a cow could eat you, it would.” How about that old taunt? It’s the sort of thing I would expect from a school kid heckling his classmate about the weird vegan meal he brought for lunch, not a man writing an editorial for Time magazine. Next, Kluger points out that meat tastes good, and we can digest it, so animals are “goin’ down.” So will he be chowing down on dogs or horses later on? Those are pretty popular eating in various parts of the world, and just as easy to digest as any other meat.

No, Kluger will not be eating those animals, because he — along with most everyone else in our culture — would feel guilty about it. The rest of his article outlines a new study in Current Directions in Psychological Science that shows that humans conveniently eat animals they decide are “dumb,” and consider charismatic and companion animals to be smarter than those they eat. Of course, this mindfulness scale is based on cultural factors, not real intelligence, otherwise Americans would favor cat meat over pork. Kluger then goes on to disclaim that “gratuitously subjecting animals to suffering” — as with factory farm battery cages and gestation crages — “is a bad thing.”

I have to agree on that last point, but what’s the main argument in Kluger’s article, exactly? That people shouldn’t feel guilty about eating animals because they can talk themselves out of feeling guilty about eating animals? Well, they don’t need Kluger to tell them that, but they say most people only read the headlines these days, so I bet plenty of Time-subscribing omnivores are feeling pretty validated right now.

What do you think about Kluger’s arguments? Did you expect better from Time?

Note: Comments that appear on the site are not the opinion of If you see an abusive post, please click the link beside the post to report it.
notpc 5/16/2014 12:55:48 PM Report

There are much better arguments for eating meat. The main reason is the concentrated, easily absorbed nutrition that comes from meat compared to plants. Minerals such as iron and calcium are very easily absorbed by the human gut from meat and dairy, but are partially blocked in plant foods that contain phytate and oxalate. It is quite challenging to get enough of these and several other minerals from plants alone.

Omega 3 fatty acids are complete in meat and fish where as they must be converted from one form to another coming from plants. The conversion process results in less than 20% of what one would get from the animal and fish products.

Most are aware of the issue of protein, with animal products providing proteins with all the essential amino acids, but legumes and grains each only providing half. It requires diligent monitoring to make sure one is getting a balance of amino acids if one chooses not to eat meat. Most people aren't going to do that.
Advertising | Membership | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | About | Contact Us | Feedback

Copyright ©2014 - All rights reserved